[28208] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Table Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (I Am Not An Isp)
Thu Apr 20 04:35:09 2000
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000420012810.00b73f00@mail.ianai.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 01:29:28 -0700
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: I Am Not An Isp <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <E12i4ps-0002mP-00@rip.psg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 05:28 PM 4/19/00 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> A large file of baseline traceroutes could replace the benefits of
>> disclosure, I suppose.
>
>if it could, many of us would beg someone to do it RIGOROUSLY and publish.
[...]
> o and it still would not tell you who is paying whom when it is peering
What has that got to do with *operational* benefits. And why would it make
any difference to a traceroute?
>randy
TTFN,
patrick
--
I Am Not An Isp - www.ianai.net
ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
"Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle
(Enable? We dunt need no stinkin' enable!!)
