[28206] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Table Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Fraizer)
Thu Apr 20 02:36:38 2000
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:34:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
Reply-To: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
To: Steve Meuse <smeuse@genuity.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20000419191244.00a2e100@127.0.0.1>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000420023011.25255A-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Steve Meuse wrote:
> 2. Settlement based peering has more to do with traffic ratios than
> anything else.
>
> -Steve
You nailed it with that one. (According to our agreement with -NDA nixed
name-)
The question then becomes one of: Which end of the equation do you want
to be on? The one sending traffic or the one receiving traffic? How does
one determine who is at greater benefit from the peering relationship?
John
