[28198] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Table Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Barrows)
Wed Apr 19 19:42:12 2000
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:38:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Barrows <jsb@UU.NET>
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004191922290.7691-100000@preg.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0004191923510.3154-100000@neserve0.corp.us.uu.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Sean -
We sign and comply with mutual non-disclosure agreements
that inhibit my ability to share that information with you.
This is not a technical issue.
I look forward to viewing your backhoe reports.
- jsb
--
Jeff Barrows
Director, Internetwork Engineering
UUNET, an MCI-Worldcom Company
> Date: 19 Apr 2000 13:30:38 -0700
> From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Peering Table Question
>
> On Wed, 19 April 2000, Jeff Barrows wrote:
> > One shouldn't necessarily believe any third-party web
> > pages, documents, articles, or verbal statements about
> > which networks any given network is peered with.
> >
> > Though I have seen many articles, web pages, and other
> > tables that detail which networks are 'peering,' I
> > have never seen an accurate representation of this
> > type of data from a third party.
>
> Then I hope you would step forward and show us the best practice
> for making accurate information available about which networks
> any given network peers with starting with yours. I look forward
> to viewing the information about your network peering on your website
> or IRR or whatever method you decide to use.
