[28185] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Table Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (brett watson)
Wed Apr 19 16:28:19 2000
Message-Id: <200004192017.NAA07091@ug.mibh.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:10:12 CDT."
<Pine.LNX.4.03.10004191608340.17229-100000@quincy.megatokyo.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 13:17:25 -0700
From: brett watson <bwatson@mibh.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>
> > > are mis-representing themselves as [cost-free-] peering
> > > with other networks when they are actually customers, or
> > > in some type of 'settlement' arrangement.
> >
> > i contend that one can count the true tier one networks on the fingers
> > of two hands.
> >
>
> Howabout offering us your pearls and letting us in on who these mysterious
> select group of 'real' tier one networks are?
the question is: does it make any difference today, other than from a
marketing perspective?
-b
