[28042] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cooked journalism
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Crocker)
Wed Apr 5 15:40:30 2000
Message-Id: <4.3.0.20000405123303.00b6c100@mail.bayarea.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 12:37:28 -0700
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20000405142347.45ECB41F16@SIGABA.research.att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:23 AM 4/5/00 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>Anyway -- that experience gave me a strong dislike for any arbitrary attempt
>to define a "real" journalist. A journalist is as a journalist does -- and,
>whether you like the story or not, or like Cook or not, his decision to
>publish was completely in accord with the standards of his profession.
Steve, et al,
There are two different debates, here.
One is about the term "journalist" or, perhaps, "reporter. There is
nothing particularly productive about pursuing that debate.
The separate issue has to do with professionalism in the handling of
Exodus' publicity statement.
Simply re-printing the release and then asking challenging questions about
PSI does NOT conform to professional journalism ethics. Not by a very,
very long shot.
I cited examples of requirements that professional journalism ethics
impose, in my previous note.
d/
=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
