[28022] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Garlic)
Wed Apr 5 00:25:07 2000
Message-ID: <38EABEC0.4727CDA4@garlic.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 21:19:12 -0700
From: Garlic <garlic@garlic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON@ACES.COM>
Cc: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred@sss1.gwi.net>,
Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>,
Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Why you dragging me into this :-) We have no business relationship with
Mr. Cook!
Ehud Gavron wrote:
> This argument is specious. Gordon isn't press. Well, garlic press
> maybe.
>
> Ehud
> p.s. "press credentials" are not hard to fake, but ask Gordon for his
>
> >On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:47:50 -0400 Paul Ferguson wrote:
> >>
> >> >surprised not to see this mentioned on NANOG
> >> >
> >> > >Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000
> >> > >To: Notify
> >> > >Subject: Exodus Customer Confidential Communication
> >> > >
> >>
> >> Gordon,
> >>
> >> Does the word "confidential" elude you?
> >>
> >> - paul
>
> >Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
> >position.
>
> >If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
> >the press not report it?
>
> >If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
> >it?
>
> >If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
>
> >There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
> >press is a profound good for society....
>
> >regards,
> >fletcher
> >P.S. "Scandal-Monger", Safire, William, 2000
