[28013] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Nielsen)
Tue Apr 4 18:18:35 2000
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:16:11 -0600 (MDT)
From: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen@nielsen.net>
To: Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <v04210110b50ff54b3de1@[38.26.139.166]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004041614020.445-100000@matterhorn.nielsen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Gordon Cook wrote:
>
> I am sorry Christian but if you cared enough to read the message to
> which you are posting you would see that I am not taking part in this
> conversation
My mistake... Gordon did not write the statement below. I apologize to Gordon
for making the statement.
but in any case, this is peering issues... not a death issue
> >On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
> >
> > > Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
> > > position.
> > >
> > > If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
> > > the press not report it?
> > >
> > > If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
> > > it?
> > >
> > > If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
> > >
> > > There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
> > > press is a profound good for society....
> >
> >I am sorry gordon, i have a hard time seeing how something killing people is
> >the same as peering.
> >
> >Christian
>
> ****************************************************************
> The COOK Report on Internet Index to 8 years of the COOK Report
> 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
> (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) Battle for Cyberspace: How
> cook@cookreport.com Crucial Technical . . . - 392 pages
> just published. See http://cookreport.com/ipbattle.shtml
> ****************************************************************
>
>
