[27998] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Tue Apr 4 14:17:56 2000
Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000404141230.00c4b340@george.he.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 14:12:59 -0400
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.05.10004032204200.2104-100000@shakalaka>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:06 PM 4/3/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Interesting you should bring this up.
>
>Because one party -- the originator -- marks an electronic communique as a
>confidential communication, does that really require the reciever to keep
>it confidential?
Not in the United States.
But, of course, IANAL.
