[27985] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Lockhart)
Tue Apr 4 03:17:16 2000
To: Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>
Cc: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:15:24 EDT."
<v0421010bb50f04f445db@[192.168.0.1]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:10:39 +0100
Message-Id: <10746.954832239@sunf25>
From: Simon Lockhart <simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>4. Exodus certainly had to tell its content providers that they were
>gong to face problems in getting to somewhere between 5 and 10% of
>the Internet.
I guess this just depends on whether Exodus has any transit or not, and
whether it's already congested.
Given that the new BGP path from Exodus to PSI (as posted earlier) is only
one hop longer, is it really going to cause *that* many problems to
Exodus' customers?
Simon
--
Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1737 839676
Internet Engineering Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1737 839516
BBC Internet Services | Email: Simon.Lockhart@bbc.co.uk
Kingswood Warren,Tadworth,Surrey,UK | URL: http://support.bbc.co.uk/
