[2767] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprints definition on NAPs (question)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arun Welch)
Wed May 1 09:59:30 1996
From: Arun Welch <awelch@awelch.inhouse.compuserve.com>
To: jerry@fc.net (Jeremy Porter)
Date: Wed, 1 May 1996 09:52:11 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: loco@MFST.COM, nathan@netrail.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199605010710.CAA20530@freeside.fc.net> from "Jeremy Porter" at May 1, 96 02:10:09 am
> needless to say I don't see that
> happening, so I will have to build a backbone to three NAPs
> just like everywhere else.)
>
Not that this'll do you any good, since Sprint's current policy is no new
peers until the end of summer, at which point it may become a product (how
they plan on charging is anyone's guess) in which case they'll start peering
again.
...arun
