[27605] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: POC details for peers/NAPs/NOCs (was Re: Need routing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Howard C. Berkowitz)
Mon Feb 28 14:35:07 2000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <v0422081db4e07d75ca24@[63.216.127.98]>
In-Reply-To: <20000228105111.B8842@dilbert.exodus.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:31:39 -0500
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:51 AM -0800 2/28/2000, Jamie Rishaw wrote:
></operational-value>
>
>On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 02:01:15AM -0700, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Lauren F. Nowlin wrote:
> >
> > > Palm-to-Palm beaming limits the distribution to those who should have a
> > > valid reason for the data (i.e. no sales/vendor).
> >
> > Maybe it's time to have a "Palm data exchange" BoF at the next nanog...
> >
>
>Sounds kinky to me. Do things like this take place on the floor,
>or is this one of those "hey why dont you come back to my room.. we'll..
>trade noc lists.."
Palm data exchange is the cyber equivalent of dogs sniffing one another.
