[27542] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ulf Zimmermann)
Tue Feb 22 12:18:15 2000
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:14:17 -0800
From: Ulf Zimmermann <ulf@Alameda.net>
To: I Am Not An Isp <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000222091416.C45898@PacHell.TelcoSucks.org>
Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000219030105.00cdf100@mail.ianai.net>; from patrick@ianai.net on Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:16:11AM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:16:11AM -0800, I Am Not An Isp wrote:
>
> At 01:27 AM 2/19/00 -0700, John M. Brown wrote:
> >
> >Yes, 3561 is one of our transit. This isn't about what filters we have
> >or don't have. its about the fact that from my view there are some
> >announcements
> >that really shouldn't be on the net in the first place.
>
> The point is, those /27s, /30s and /32s are *not* on the 'Net, they are
> internal to C&W. You should not condemn the global table because C&W leaks
> specifics to their customers.
I am not connected directly to C&W, but via Exodus and I see the same
routes like 63.84.242.192/26. So they not only inside of C&W and to their
customers.
--
Regards, Ulf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-769-2936
Alameda Networks, Inc. | http://www.Alameda.net | Fax#: 510-521-5073
