[27444] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: whois and the internet broke again?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henry R. Linneweh)
Sun Feb 20 03:44:55 2000
Message-ID: <38AFA90E.1BEBD59E@concentric.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 00:42:55 -0800
From: "Henry R. Linneweh" <linneweh@concentric.net>
Reply-To: linneweh@concentric.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: danny@tcb.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I agree with this and that this list has agreed in the past with
the exodus debacle to not use the Nanog list as forum
for injuring each others business, whether it be NSI or
any other organization here.
I need an Updated Port List, the one on IANA is kind of old and
email addresses are not updated.
Danny McPherson wrote:
> > While it would probably not be an accurate assessment, it could be assumed
> > that they are doing nothing at all to fix problems ever; how would we
> > know? Considering that we (as in ISP's) are the primary source of thier
> > income, don't they owe this information to us, at least in a watered-down
> > version?
>
> Absolutely, unless assumming "us" == NANOG. But that's between
> each NSI customer and NSI, not NANOG and NSI. And as an NSI
> customer, once escalated to this level, it's something that I'd
> address directly and formally with those NSI folks, the ones that
> have that ve$ted interest in the success of NSI. I assure you that
> if you're able to demonstrate that all reasonable steps have been
> taken to follow the formal trouble reporting process, but to no
> avail, they'll be interested.
>
> and if not, well, sufficient documentation would then be in place to
> more formally address the problem.
>
> -danny
--
Thank you;
|--------------------------------------------|
| Thinking is a learned process so is UNIX |
|--------------------------------------------|
Henry R. Linneweh
