[27334] in North American Network Operators' Group
Generic filtering policies (was Re: Make Inggress Filtering the LAW for all ISPs!)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lionel Lauer)
Sat Feb 12 14:18:38 2000
From: Lionel Lauer <longword@newsguy.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 03:16:09 +0800
Reply-To: longword@newsguy.com
Message-ID: <hacbas0qfckicne94pumcb09f4seg9qe25@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <01JLTGMZ50WK92CB18@ACES.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:11:22 -0700 (MST), Ehud Gavron <GAVRON@ACES.COM>
wrote:
>Make Inggress[sic] Filtering the LAW for all NANOG postings!
>It should eliminate 99.9% of DOS posters.
Well yeah, the post wasn't terribly helpful as it stood, but OTOH, it
would certainly be helpful to have a 'model' client/peering agreement
that includes some sort of reasonable standard for what kind of traffic
should be filtered on ingress & egress.
The only one I've seen thus far are the guidelines in Cisco's
white-paper for ISPs, which (while extremely helpful) seem a little out
of date these days.
Is anyone interested in helping come up with some sort of standard
model, or at least a set of guidelines? Or do people think such a thing
would be unneccessary?
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
