[27220] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wayne Bouchard)
Thu Feb 10 02:55:40 2000
From: Wayne Bouchard <web@typo.org>
Message-Id: <200002100751.AAA69561@typo.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0002091810470.14389-100000@vellocet.insync.net> from Joe Shaw at "Feb 9, 2000 06:12:22 pm"
To: jshaw@insync.net (Joe Shaw)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:51:24 -0700 (MST)
Cc: linneweh@concentric.net (Henry R. Linneweh), nanog@merit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I repeat.. Laws in one country do NOT apply to another country.
It is arrogant to think that internet governance is a product of one
region's policies.
> Make it a law, and they will. But I don't think laws are the answer
> to cooperation. The Tier1's should take the time to work together on
> their own before they are forced to in a way they may not like.
>
> --
> Joseph W. Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
> Computer Security Consultant and Programmer
> Free UNIX advocate - "I hack, therefore I am."
>
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Henry R. Linneweh wrote:
>
> > they should be made to co-operate with the backbone provider and not have
> > much choice in the matter.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne Bouchard [Immagine Your ]
web@typo.org [Company Name Here]
Network Engineer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
