[2718] in North American Network Operators' Group
re: Sprints definition on NAPs (question)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Stratton)
Mon Apr 29 23:54:39 1996
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 21:36:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan@netrail.net>
To: John Scoggin <jscoggin@delmarva.com>
cc: mdella@farragut.Internex.NET, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <vines.EH16+k4KVlA@dewey.delmarva.com>
On Mon, 29 Apr 1996, John Scoggin wrote:
> The other question that should be asked (and I hope some folks have looked at
> this) is whether this rule is in fact arbitrary. If there is no sound
> ENGINEERING reason, it may constitute "restraint of trade" under Chapter 2 of
> the Sherman Act (if memory serves). These types of problems can be quite
> nasty, involving treble punitive damages.
Ya, but Sprint has more money then us, and money wins. :-)
Nathan Stratton CEO, NetRail, Inc. Tracking the future today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone (703)524-4800 NetRail, Inc.
Fax (703)534-5033 2007 N. 15 St. Suite 5
Email sales@netrail.net Arlington, Va. 22201
WWW http://www.netrail.net/ Access: (703) 524-4802 guest
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Matthew 6:34
