[27173] in North American Network Operators' Group
IRR/RADB (was Re: Yahoo! Lessons Learned)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Wed Feb 9 21:13:26 2000
Date: 9 Feb 2000 18:09:33 -0800
Message-ID: <20000210020933.25326.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: hank@rem.com
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 09 February 2000, Henry Kilmer wrote:
> Kai Schlichting writes:
> >I recall that SprintLink had some, uhm, plans to put ingress (and
> >egress?) filters on all interfaces facing dedicated customers that
> >were not multi-homed. This came after realization that education of
>
> This becomes rather difficult to do properly when a large percentage
> of an ISPs customer base are multihomed. The unicast RPF check knob
> does not handle this situation so you are left generating access
> lists which has different scaling issues to contend with. Still
> doable but more difficult.
I know this is in the category of beating a dead horse, but....
This sounds like the perfect application for the IRR/RADB.
