|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:59:05 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com> To: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com> Cc: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net>, nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000209082446.00a6cdc0@lint.cisco.com> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002091056450.275-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Paul Ferguson wrote: > Well, we _do_ have a unicast RPF knob, but changing defaults > is tough, due to the Principle of Least Astonishment. ;-) Sorry, this may be low, but... It would help if we could actually turn on CEF and not have it break weird and interesting things. This week it seems to have broken frame relay adaptive traffic shaping (it always "adapts"), which I need to contact the TAC about finding/submitting a bug. (CEF is required at least on "lower end" routers for RPF) - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) KD7EHZ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |