[27096] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Wed Feb 9 08:11:35 2000
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000209080818.00a5dc30@lint.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 08:09:02 -0500
To: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@quadrunner.com>
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20000208221811.A21726@quadrunner.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:18 PM 02/08/2000 -0800, Craig A. Huegen wrote:
>Yes and no. The ability to track the perpetrators back to the source
>would be enough to scare some of these kids away. For those who weren't
>scared away, the resultant (and easy) traceback and subsequent arrest,
>conviction, and jail time would provide even more of an example.
Exactly.
I think may people miss that subtle point....
- paul
