[27081] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MAE-East Problems?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Feb 9 03:41:16 2000
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000209103400.007fe2c0@max.ibm.net.il>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:34:00 +0200
To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>,
NANOG Mailing List <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20000209092342.C18688@skriver.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 09:23 09/02/00 +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote:
If Mae-East/Mae-West/Mae-Houston/Mae-LA stats were up to date (ends Nov 21,
1999), perhaps we could find a pattern related to the distributed DoS going
on:
http://www.mfsdatanet.com:80/MAE/east.stats.html
-Hank
>
>On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 06:54:04PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it.
>>
>> I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE.
>
>Yes ? Why don't you show where the problem is, then it's easier to try
>to narrow the problem down to a specific switch - or to you port/router.
>
>/Jesper
>
>--
>Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456
>Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
>Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
>
>One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
>One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
>
>
