[27065] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Thomas)
Tue Feb 8 20:23:57 2000
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 01:22:01 +0000
From: Sam Thomas <sthomas@lart.net>
To: I Am Not An Isp <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000209012200.A19957@lart.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000208161748.02b5dc90@ianai.net>; from I Am Not An Isp on Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 04:18:16PM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 04:18:16PM -0800, I Am Not An Isp wrote:
>
> At 06:59 PM 2/8/00 -0500, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> >See:
> >
> > http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1007-200-1544910.html?dtn.head
>
> I thought the whole point of NANOG was to give the Internet a break -
> 'cause lord knows it breaks every NANOG....
not true. we here at $ISP have found that having our engineers out of town
and watching boring powerpoint presentations all day actually enhances
network performance and availability. ;-)
--
Sam Thomas
Geek Mercenary
