[26989] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dave o'leary)
Thu Feb 3 08:50:46 2000
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000203051326.01413c60@pobox3.juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2000 05:21:00 -0800
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, woody@zocalo.net
From: "dave o'leary" <doleary@juniper.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20000201191031.22257.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 11:10 AM 2/1/00 -0800, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Tue, 01 February 2000, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> I agree entirely. I can't stand it when people are too sheepish to
> publish Best Common Practices just because there are a few companies that
> don't feel like putting in the effort to do a halfway decent job. God
> knows we wouldn't want anyone to feel left out, even if they do insist on
> running open relays, or redistributing their IGP or whatever. Bleah.
Indeed. I did not mean to suggest that such a thing (BCP) shouldn't be
done, but rather set expectations that some may try to create a perception of
participation while continually dragging feet, objecting to minor points,
etc. to slow progress. So, press on, I look forward to seeing progress
in this area.
thanks,
dave
