[26936] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Woodcock)
Tue Feb 1 04:37:20 2000

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 01:36:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@zocalo.net>
To: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cybernothing.org>
Cc: "dave o'leary" <doleary@juniper.net>,
	Sam Thomas <sthomas@lart.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20000131153919.Z857@cybernothing.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000201013417.1483K-100000@secure>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


    > 	Those of us who are willing to communicate with each other
    > 	should go ahead and write up a BCP, because the folks who're
    > 	scared to admit that they're fallible won't follow it anyway.

I agree entirely.  I can't stand it when people are too sheepish to
publish Best Common Practices just because there are a few companies that
don't feel like putting in the effort to do a halfway decent job.  God
knows we wouldn't want anyone to feel left out, even if they do insist on
running open relays, or redistributing their IGP or whatever.  Bleah.

                                -Bill




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post