[2692] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routes and routing tables
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Zeeff)
Sat Apr 27 20:31:53 1996
From: jon@branch.com (Jon Zeeff)
To: rob@elite.exodus.net (Robert Bowman)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 20:31:07 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: cnielsen@vii.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199604280751.AAA00306@elite.exodus.net> from "Robert Bowman" at Apr 28, 96 00:51:41 am
Sounds like a good reason to agressively aggregate, unless people indicate
that there are reasons (like part of the /16 is dual homed) for not doing
so for specific blocks.
I prefer this over most of the "not routing larger prefixes" thing.
> In certain circumstances, the people will advertise every class C in a /16 as
> well as advertising the /16. It's turned into something worse than pre-CIDR.
