[26822] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg A. Woods)
Wed Jan 19 11:48:46 2000
Message-Id: <m12AyDj-000g5eC@most.weird.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:44:35 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: woods@most.weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <38821618.227B5DA4@NorthShoreTechnologies.net>
Reply-To: woods@weird.com (Greg A. Woods)
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
[ On Sunday, January 16, 2000 at 14:03:52 (-0500), Steve Sobol wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS
>
> It's not as proactive as ORBS. But there are a lot fewer false
> positives. I'd venture to say that the actual number is very
> close to zero. :)
ORBS cannot, by definition, have any "false positives". Only a user of
ORBS could determine that in any case (eg. when manual entries have been
added for whatever reason). This kind of slip-up in your thinking may
be another key to why so many people misunderstand it.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <gwoods@acm.org> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>
