[26797] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: CEF Load balancing...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Mon Jan 17 06:18:28 2000
Message-Id: <200001171103.LAA27248@genesis.domino.org>
To: "Sykes, Phil" <phil.sykes@cweurope.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, neil@domino.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Jan 2000 20:02:48 +0100."
<NBBBJFOKCFEMKNFBDNIJGEGMFKAA.phil.sykes@cweurope.net>
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:03:53 +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 20:02:48 +0100
"Sykes, Phil" <phil.sykes@cweurope.net> wrote:
>
>
> A sh cdp neighbors detailed at AMS-IX last week revealed that roughly half
> of those running on 75xx/12xxx plaforms were running an IOS 12.0, mostly
> 12.0(5)S and newer.
> Slightly more than half of those on smaller Cisco platforms were also doing
> so.
>
> Of course, this doesn't mean they're using 12.0 releases elsewhere, but
> it's a fairly safe bet.
>
> There were some major players amongst those running 12.0, but I'm not sure
> it would be terribly appropriate to name names.
>
If you need GSR power you really don't have a choice but to use 12.
We're running 11.1.CC25 on our 7500's because we've never seen a release
of 12 that works well with VIP2-50s. YMMV. We're about to use 12 on
some new GSR boxes we have.
Regards,
Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking
neil@DOMINO.ORG
