[26616] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Selection of Appropriate Local SMTP Relay
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Mon Jan 10 11:01:16 2000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Message-Id: <200001101628.IAA06984@vacation.karoshi.com>
To: joe.provo@rcn.com
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Cc: johnl@iecc.com (John R. Levine), jabley@patho.gen.nz,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20000110103606.A69181@ultra.net> from "Joe Provo - Network Architect" at Jan 10, 2000 10:36:06 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Revised as the roamops wg in the IETF. Current efforts are the AAA and
mobilip wgs. ymmv.
> It is interesting to note that the problems of applying this methodology
> in a port wholesaling environment did not come up; I think the membership
> was composed mostly of folks who would be considered the 'wholsalee'
> rather than the 'wholesaler'. But the list did spring from a
> conversation like this on NANOG ... the archive used to be at
> ftp://ftp.uk.psi.net/psi/rfc-roamip, and that's gone;
---
