[26587] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Netgate.net.nz/ORBS spam colusion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sat Jan 8 11:17:41 2000

Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 08:14:30 -0800
From: owen@dixon.delong.sj.ca.us (Owen DeLong)
Message-Id: <200001081614.IAA05255@irkutsk.delong.sj.ca.us>
To: wsimpson@greendragon.com, william@dso.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



However, I must question whether the activity Dean discusses is actually
criminal.  He does not accuse them of carrying out the attacks, he
accuses them of transporting information published by a third party
which notifies the world that his site is vulnerable to these attacks.

Since Dean has published information to NANOG and other public forums
stating that:
	1.	His sites _ARE_ vulnerable.
	2.	He has no willingness to fix these vulnerabilities.
	3.	He intends to make the internet at large responsible
		for his negligence WRT these sites.

I seriously doubt that publishing a list of known public-nuissances
is genuinely illegal.  Further, unless Dean has presented netgate
with a court-order showing that the court has indeed found said
activity to be illegal, I think they would be negligent in turning
off said service.

How would you like it if your ISP shut you down because I
complained to them that you were sending out messages that
contained information that was publicly available, but which
I didn't want published?  That's what Dean's really saying.


Owen

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On 08-Jan-2000 William Allen Simpson wrote:
> > 
> > Dean Anderson wrote:
> >> 
> >> I would like to get your opinions on this.
> >> 
> > My opinion is that you should sue them vigorously -- and lose.  This 
> > would help the rest of us immensely by providing a solid precedent for 
> > common carrier liability regarding the activities of our subscribers. 
> 
> Every law I have seen limits common carrier liability exemption when the
> carrier has knowledge of the illegal activity.  It is only protection when the
> carrier is not aware of the activity.
> 
> - --
> William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
> DSo Networks  http://dso.net/
> Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
> GPG/PGP Key at http://dso.net/wwalsh.gpg
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: DSo Networks
> 
> iD8DBQE4drtE8zLmV94Pz+IRAvBTAKDD9O9amegIE65UJ1Lj2htV44EurwCgrTaN
> Ua63qpzcXJK//Rs1PuRDfPc=
> =Xy8H
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post