[26193] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: A call for the future. Was: Re: Verio Decides what parts

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dean Anderson)
Wed Dec 8 18:42:41 1999

Message-Id: <3.0.32.19991208182353.01053520@odie.av8.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 18:24:30 -0500
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Dan Foster <dsf@gblx.net>
From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
Cc: Tim Wolfe <tim@clipper.net>, Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu>,
	NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Around 03:09 PM 12/8/1999 -0800, rumor has it that Randy Bush said:
>reality check:
>
>if you had 100TB of on-ASIC SRAM you would still be screwed.  you can't
>afford the PER-PACKET LATENCY of telco number style portability REFERRAL.
>
>once again: ip is a connectionless protocol.  each packet is potentially a
>new route.

Potentially, but not really.

>telcos don't mind a second or two in call setup, because it is CALL SETUP,
>not 42 times a second.

Call setups do not take a second or two. Call setups that traverse 50 switches take a second or two.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
           Plain Aviation, Inc                  dean@av8.com
           LAN/WAN/UNIX/NT/TCPIP          http://www.av8.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post