[26084] in North American Network Operators' Group
Filter Policies (was: Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jan Ahrent Czmok)
Sat Dec 4 12:17:49 1999
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 18:16:28 +0100
From: Jan Ahrent Czmok <czmok@darwin.gigabell.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <19991204181628.A27150@darwin.gigabell.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hello!
IMHO, i also propose to have a clear discussion about some issues which came into my mind
when reading all this mails.
The next NANOG might be really a good place for this issue.
There are some unanswered things:
- optimize the Routing Table (e.g. how to come to an agreement with even the largest
isps but also including smaller ones)
- recent discussed Authorization of Routes and validation
- how we all together can get rid of the swamp space (e.g. it MUST the possible somehow)
- hints and tips and coordination of filter policies.
But these are just my .5 cents
Jan
