[25747] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: No Op. - Arbitration clauses in peering agreements [WAY OFF TOPIC]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bruce Campbell)
Wed Nov 10 16:26:40 1999
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 06:51:44 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Campbell <bc@vicious.dropbear.id.au>
To: Majdi Abbas <majdi@puck.nether.net>
Cc: "Lauren F. Nowlin" <ren@onyx.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199911101906.OAA13032@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991111064802.48436s-100000@zerlargal.humbug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Majdi Abbas wrote:
> > a) The number of arbitrators shall be three (3), the first to be
> 'Three' shall be the number of the arbitrators, and the number of
> the arbitrators shall be three. 'Four' shalt thou not arbitrate, and
This raises the question:
What is the legalese of an unladen arbitrator?
--==--
Bruce.
or, what is the bandwidth of an unladen wireless card? ;) </ietf joke>
