[25547] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP and NAT (question and some thoughts)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex P. Rudnev)
Mon Oct 18 17:10:03 1999
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 23:36:33 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex@virgin.relcom.eu.net>
To: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199910181931.PAA22451@Iodine.Mlink.NET>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9910182334270.547-100000@virgin.relcom.eu.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I do not know, but it seems this train is over...
It was replaced, for example, by the ability of the http protocol to
support a few virtual hosts at the same IP address.
> > HOST_NAME:SERVICE -> IP_ADDRESS:PORT
> >
> > Now we have a lot of troubles due to this choose.
>
> Of course if we could implement RFC2052 everywhere...
>
> I wonder if _any_ popular end user software has quietly added forward
> compatibility with SRV records?
>
