[25459] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Regarding global BGP community values
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Li)
Thu Oct 14 02:10:17 1999
Message-ID: <3805736C.E2406E81@home.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 23:08:44 -0700
From: Tony Li <tony1@home.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex@virgin.relcom.eu.net>
Cc: Oleg Tabarovsky <olg@amt.ru>, danny@ice.ip.qwest.net,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> The fundamental feature for the REAL-TIME device (such as ROUTER) should be
> a lot of HOT-DOG mechanisms preventing /at least/ lost of the control over
> the device. In case of such _voracious_ processes (as BGP is) it should
> be used any mechanism preventing it from catching all existing
> resources
> (CPU and MEMORY in our case).
I think you mean a 'watch dog'. Most routers already have lots of 'hot dogs' around them. ;-)
Tony
