[25424] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Regarding global BGP community values
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex P. Rudnev)
Wed Oct 13 05:33:31 1999
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:08:33 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex@virgin.relcom.eu.net>
To: Tony Li <tony1@home.net>
Cc: danny@ice.ip.qwest.net, "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <38044686.FBA5AD5A@home.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9910131306110.547-100000@virgin.relcom.eu.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > work even when this leak disappeared... I don't blame the
> > software
> > designers, they must found the compromise between the stability,
> > time_to_implement, cost and memory, but I'd like to highlight that they
> > really did not concerned
> > about such _cheap_ thing as memory at all). (let me to put -:) here).
>
> On behalf of {myself, Paul, Ravi, Enke}, I assure you that Cisco's BGP has _always_ been
> worried about conserving memory.
BGP - yes, total architecture - not at all. Even very simple ensuranses
_don't allow the process eating already 90% of the memory to eat last 10%_
and _defragment the garbage_ was not realised, and if some (BGP for
example) process became crazy and over-eat something, not one can even
log-in and say _reload_ -:).
>
> Tony
>
>
>
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
