[25211] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: FW: your mail

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex \"Mr. Worf\" Yuriev)
Sat Sep 25 19:51:15 1999

Date: Sat, 25 Sep 1999 19:49:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Alex \"Mr. Worf\" Yuriev" <alex@netaxs.com>
To: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr@uol.com.br>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, Stephen Sprunk <ssprunk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <004101bf0640$6758f520$5cf1e7c8@users.uol.com.br>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.95.990925194818.29716B-100000@access.netaxs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> > I have listened to their seminar about this... As the simple L5 firewall
> > it's not bad, through it realise the fixed set of ruls and defends your
> > from the simple SMTP attacks only. But anyway, IOS FW is just what 90% of
> > the customers need...
> 
> How would IOS FW perform on Cisco 7x00-class equipment with 100M-to-Gigabit
> traffic ?

Umm... Very poorly.

Alex



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post