[25181] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: )
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (john heasley)
Thu Sep 23 12:58:06 1999
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:45:15 -0700
From: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: "dave o'leary" <doleary@juniper.net>
Cc: Derek Balling <dredd@megacity.org>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <19990923094514.X1149@shrubbery.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990923091237.0229af00@pobox.juniper.net>; from dave o'leary on Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 09:16:05AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 09:16:05AM -0700, dave o'leary wrote:
>
> At 05:45 AM 9/22/99 -0700, Derek Balling wrote:
>
> >So now, even the age-old "litmus test" of "how do I program my Cisco to do
> >that?" is a bad one?
>
> Actually, in the case of service providers, this is exactly why the
> "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" was established. Well, it wasn't really
> established at that site, but that's where it migrated later. The list
> is available for discussion of cisco service provider specific discussions
> just like this one. If you want to talk about Juniper routers, on the
> other hand.... :-) :-)
> dave
dave, i believe juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net already exists.
> >At 01:09 AM 9/22/99 -0700, Mike Leber wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Don't mean to be rude, these questions would be more appropriate for
> >>inet-access, et al. Most people on this list are national or
> >>international backbone operators. Appropriate topics concern operating
> >>backbones.
> >>
> >>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I'm looking similarly, but T1/PRI for dial-in support and a T3 to the
> >> > Internet.
> >> > Got Cisco 6509 on the Internet side and Ascend MAX 6000 on the WAN side.
> >> > Bothe managed by Checkpoint, on a Sun Ultra5.
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> >> > > Gerry McDonald
> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 9:13 AM
> >> > > To: nanog@merit.edu
> >> > > Subject:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I have a question... I am currently expanding our network to
> >> > > accommodate a T1 to the
> >> > > Internet and a 512K frame connection to our WAN.. I need to
> >> > > purchase a router and spoke
> >> > > to several vendors. I have heard conflicting stories
> >> > > regarding the model of Cisco router I
> >> > > should get.
> >> > >
> >> > > One vendor <vendor a> tells me that I should get a 2620 with
> >> > > 2 Wan Ports and the other
> >> > > vendor <vendor b> is telling me that I might compromise my
> >> > > security by using one router for
> >> > > WAN and Internet connections. Their suggesting that I get 2
> >> > > routers one for my Wan and
> >> > > another for the Internet connection...
> >> > >
> >> > > Vendor B is telling me that it would be possible to enter our
> >> > > wan without touching our firewall
> >> > > should someone be able to hack into our IOS on the router...
> >> > >
> >> > > I decided to go the experts... I would appreciate any helpful
> >> > > suggestions.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks...
> >> > >
> >> > > -Gerry
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>+------------------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -------------------+
> >>| Mike Leber Direct Internet Connections Voice 408 282 1540 |
> >>| Hurricane Electric Web Hosting Colocation Fax 408 971 3340 |
> >>| mleber@he.net http://www.he.net |
> >>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> >
>
