[2459] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Fleming)
Sat Apr 6 12:57:13 1996
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@unety.net>
To: "'Avi Freedman'" <freedman@netaxs.com>,
Jim Fleming
<JimFleming@unety.net>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>,
"pferguso@cisco.com"
<pferguso@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 11:50:39 -0600
On Saturday, April 06, 1996 2:23 AM, Avi Freedman[SMTP:freedman@netaxs.com] wrote:
@> As part of the educational effort you might want to add information about
@> IPng (IPv6) as well as RFC 1918...this may help to give people hope...
@
@Until there's an operational plan for simplifying routing by using IPng,
@I think we'll avoid mentioning it since it begs the question "If we can't
@route 2^32 addresses..."
@
@> Jim Fleming
@
@Avi
@
Yes...that is why we are coding as fast as we can on C+@nIP (or IPv8)...:-)
--
Jim Fleming
UNETY Systems, Inc.
Naperville, IL 60563
e-mail: JimFleming@unety.net
