[24197] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended NON-VIP based 7500 swtching paths
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Fri May 28 11:29:38 1999
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 11:28:14 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
To: Brandon Applegate <brandon@one.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Reply-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Mail-Followup-To: Brandon Applegate <brandon@one.net>, nanog@merit.edu,
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9905281045100.11017-100000@chrome.burn.net>; from Brandon Applegate on Fri, May 28, 1999 at 10:51:32AM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
This would really be something for cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I've cc:'ed them, and set them as the reply-to, so
followups should go there.
- jared
On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 10:51:32AM -0400, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I was looking to get some feedback as to what people are using in
> production on 75XX routers on standard line cards (HIP for example) for
> switching paths. I read one time on Cisco's site that on a 7500 non-vip
> router, you can see up to 150k PPS using plain fast-switching, and up to
> 275k by using optimum. Could someone be kind enough to elaborate on the
> differences between fast/optimum switching other than the addition of
> 'optimum' on the command line ?? I dont remeber seeing too much detailed
> info on the differences of these earlier switching paths on CCO.
>
> Feel free to reply directly via email/off-list.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Brandon Applegate, CCNA : Network Administrator
> http://www.one.net : brandon@one.net
> --------------------------------------------------
>
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
