[2392] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: the Internet Backbone

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Fri Apr 5 12:03:19 1996

Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 12:00:33 -0500
To: William Allen Simpson <bsimpson@morningstar.com>
From: John Curran <jcurran@bbnplanet.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu

At 10:32 AM 4/5/96, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>> From: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
>>...
>> Everyone (of importance) agrees that in order to claim you're a backbone
>> you have to (now, not a year ago) be connected to at least 2 public NAPs/MAEs
>> and have at least one circuit that runs at DS3 or higher speed.
>>
>No, that is not correct.
>
>A US Internet "backbone" is one which connects to ALL the NAP/MAEs in
>the US.  Not just two.  All of them.

Bill,
 
     I'm not sure that's a viable definition.   First, the number of MAE's 
     seems to be increasing withou bound, and secondly, there are points
     that you don't want to connect due to their performance.  Finally, is 
     "connecting" considered the same as "peering"?

/John



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post