[23737] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The future of NAPs & IXPs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay R. Ashworth)
Mon Apr 19 16:21:30 1999
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 12:57:19 -0400
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra@scfn.thpl.lib.fl.us>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990419084442.00b18ba0@proteus.equinix.com>; from "William B. Norton" <wbn@equinix.com> on Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 08:44:42AM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 08:44:42AM -0700, William B. Norton wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in posting a response; there were issues with the
> nanog-post list. Who created that thing anyway ;-)
Um, you? ;-)
> providers to troubleshoot, etc. The greater the dependence on
> interconnection, the more hardened you want that interconnection environment.
It's worth pointing out, as a sidebar to that, that the greater the
dependence on interconnection, the more hardened it's _feasible_ to make
that interconnection environment, assuming you've rolled your numbers
right. Staying on the proper side of that curve is important...
Cheers,
- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com
Member of the Technical Staff Buy copies of The New Hackers Dictionary.
The Suncoast Freenet Give them to all your friends.
Tampa Bay, Florida http://www.ccil.org/jargon/ +1 813 790 7592
