[2371] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike O'Dell)
Thu Apr 4 21:45:38 1996
To: Jim Fleming <JimFleming@unety.net>
cc: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net>,
"'Tim Bass (PIER)'" <pier@dune.silkroad.com>,
"dalvenja@ict.org" <dalvenja@ict.org>,
"nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>, "pier@isi.edu" <pier@isi.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 Apr 1996 13:49:34 CST."
<01BB222D.8F8436E0@webster.unety.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 21:39:55 -0500
From: "Mike O'Dell" <mo@uunet.uu.net>
Or as Bullwinkle said:
"No doubt about it, I gotta get another hat!"
For my money, the solution is IPv6 with 8+8 addresses, so the
routing goop can be changed without impacting the transport
machinery. this will allow essentially transparent "renumbering"
if done right.
And rule (13):
"Often the easiest way to resolve a problem is to simply
agree not to have it."
-mo
