[23627] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: proper list for net abuse discussions?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rich Sena)
Sat Apr 3 18:01:53 1999
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 1999 17:10:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Rich Sena <ras@poppa.thick.net>
To: "Oh Bastion of the pure and simple-hearted..." <NANOG@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199904022300.SAA00870@heimdall.ttsg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Wow another meaningless thread - that must be my cue...
Isn't this nothing more than a feeble attempt by the state of Geirgia to
generate tourism advertising ona a public list...
On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, TTSG wrote:
> Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 18:00:39 -0500 (EST)
> From: TTSG <ttsg@ttsg.com>
> To: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net>
> Cc: ttsg@ttsg.com, nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: proper list for net ae iscussions?
>
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, TTSG wrote:
> > > We were hoping that "Hack-Track" would be the forum.
> > > Check out http://www.hack-track.com for instructions.
> >
> > Shouldnt that be cracker-tracker. It might be excusable for techology
> > illiterate journalists to misuse the term "hack" but its inexcusable for
> > computer professionals.
> >
> I'd rather not get into a discussion about this, since as an
> "ex-hacker" from 1978.... To me "hacker" is computer, "cracker" is software.
>
> Tuc/TTSG
>
--
I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras@poppa.thick.net
