[23518] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: route announcement question (political rather than technical)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeremiah Kristal)
Wed Mar 24 12:49:31 1999
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:34:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeremiah Kristal <jeremiah@fs.IConNet.NET>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <m10PrVW-0008G4C@rip.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Randy Bush wrote:
> if a customer is multi-homed we will announce a (possibly improper) subset
> of the other tier one provider's space.
>
> if a customer is showing the good judgement of rehoming to us, we will
> announce the (possibly improper) subset of the other tier one provider's
> space for as long as the renumbering grace period of the other provider.
>
> we expect the same of others.
Of course, but do you require any documentation from their other provider
that they are allowed to re-announce those addresses? The issue isn't
whether we should re-announce, but what documentation we should require
before doing so.
Jeremiah
Jeremiah Kristal
Qwest Internet Solutions
Manager, Network Services
201-319-5764
x284 internal
