[23450] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question about subnetting /24's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Fri Mar 19 00:58:24 1999
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Brett_Watson@enron.net
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 22:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Cc: sgifford@tir.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <88256739.001BFC82.00@pinto.enron.net> from "Brett_Watson@enron.net" at Mar 18, 99 09:17:15 pm
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> it's safe to post to nanog once you've read the charter, lurked for 12
> months, absorbed each individual's variation of what's ok to post and
> what's not.... actually, forget it, buy a book.
>
> -brett
and how to appease the nanog OAPP (operational applicability posting police).
(and michael, you might also look into RFC 1878 for vlsm options
and RFC 1122/23 for in-depth detail on the permutations on the
appropriate values for broadcast and the subtle distinctions between
all-ones and subnet-ones)
--bill
