[23428] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fwd: Re: [NIC-990226.52da] Suggestion: Add contact entry to whois
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Douglas A. Dever)
Thu Mar 18 00:02:01 1999
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 22:25:30 -0500 (EST)
From: "Douglas A. Dever" <dever@oh.verio.net>
Reply-To: ddever@verio.net
To: Owen DeLong <owen@dixon.DeLong.SJ.CA.US>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199903151708.JAA09272@irkutsk.delong.sj.ca.us>
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> If RWHOIS were the universal mechanism for maintaining domain information,
> that would be true. Here's my line of thinking:
>
> Problem:
[SPAM complaints going to the "wrong" place]
> Solution:
[Adding an "abuse" and a "security" contact]
[snip...]
IMHO, that's what the administrative contact is for. It's his/her domain
and his/her responsibility. If they don't like getting spam complaints
from people, then perhaps they should control their domain. If that
dosen't work, then you address it with their upstream. Adding more
entries to keep updated to whois is pointless.
-dd
