|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:20:47 -0500 (EST) From: Rich Sena <ras@poppa.thick.net> To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Cc: Alex Bligh <amb@gxn.net>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <19990308083142.B13100@puck.nether.net> On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Jared Mauch wrote: > Most "real" providers have diverse nameservers. For them, > this is not a problem, but for the other 99% of domains > that are delegated, they have their nameservers on the same > ethernet segment. > > Domain Name: MONICALEWINSKI.COM > > Domain servers in listed order: > > ZORK.TIAC.NET 199.0.65.2 > SUNDOG.TIAC.NET 199.0.65.9 > > This means once your /24 drops from routing, > you have no primary nor secondary nameservice. Whelp I used to work for that company - and I know that 199.0.65.0/24 is on a FDDI ring shared by 2 7507's and all common services are on that ring - each 7507 has a HSSI with a DS3 to different exchanges to UUNET - so you're right if UUNET goes down then it is dead - I know the 2 DS3's terminate diferently but they will be down if UUNET is... -- I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras@poppa.thick.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |