[23249] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Secondary DNS for Paraguay's TLD?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (alex@nac.net)
Mon Mar 8 09:22:32 1999
From: alex@nac.net
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:20:24 -0500 (EST)
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19990307142457.B22768@puck.nether.net>
> Anyone in a situation like this, I'm willing to do secondaries
> for these sorts of domains, and plan to build a secondary-dns-server
> engine that people would be able to send templates to, etc..
Same here; nac.net would be willing to host any secondary DNS for anyone,
specifically TLDs or foreign folks. Foreign to the US, that is :-)
> IMHO, the internic should not allow any domains to have pri+sec nameserver
> in the same /24
Amen, except it can be misleading.
NS1.NAC.NET 207.99.0.1
NS2.NAC.NET 207.99.0.2
NS6.NAC.NET 209.123.20.243
Whilst 207.99.0.1 and .2 are on the same /24 (obviously), 207.99.0/24 is
subnetted to 256 /32's, and routed to the machines. Why? So, when a
machine/name-server moves within our network, it doesn't have to be
renumbered.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
Alex Rubenstein, alex@nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone! http://www.nac.net
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
