|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1996 21:54:27 -0500 To: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com> From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com> Cc: nanog@merit.edu At 07:30 PM 4/2/96 -0800, Michael Dillon wrote: >> >Hmmm.... ISP has T1 to SPRINT, wants to switch to MCI, SPRINT says, OK >> >you have a choice, either renumber or pay us to route your traffic to MCI >> >via a private exchange point so we don't have to knock holes in our >> >aggregate. That way you can use SPRINT's addresses and MCI's T1, but for >> >a fee. >> >> And the global routing table grows. > >If this is done with a private two-party exchange point, then can't it >also be done without any change in the global routing table? > I'm not sure this is practical. In any event, this why people have been bitching about people punching holes in large CIDR blocks. - paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |