|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1996 19:46:53 -0500 To: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com> From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com> Cc: nanog@merit.edu At 04:26 PM 4/2/96 -0800, Michael Dillon wrote: >On Tue, 2 Apr 1996, Curtis Villamizar wrote: > >> If the providers were to relax the requirements to renumber when >> moving to another provider or when dual homing, the problem of the >> TWD would not be growing at its current rate. > >Hmmm.... ISP has T1 to SPRINT, wants to switch to MCI, SPRINT says, OK >you have a choice, either renumber or pay us to route your traffic to MCI >via a private exchange point so we don't have to knock holes in our >aggregate. That way you can use SPRINT's addresses and MCI's T1, but for >a fee. > And the global routing table grows. - paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |