[2287] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Dillon)
Tue Apr 2 18:39:56 1996
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 16:26:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>
To: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
cc: Sean Donelan <SEAN@sdg.dra.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199604021738.MAA25831@brookfield.ans.net>
On Tue, 2 Apr 1996, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> If the providers were to relax the requirements to renumber when
> moving to another provider or when dual homing, the problem of the
> TWD would not be growing at its current rate.
Hmmm.... ISP has T1 to SPRINT, wants to switch to MCI, SPRINT says, OK
you have a choice, either renumber or pay us to route your traffic to MCI
via a private exchange point so we don't have to knock holes in our
aggregate. That way you can use SPRINT's addresses and MCI's T1, but for
a fee.
Michael Dillon Voice: +1-604-546-8022
Memra Software Inc. Fax: +1-604-546-3049
http://www.memra.com E-mail: michael@memra.com
